Friday, June 06, 2008

{of books}

I haven't been reading a great many books this year, but I'll tell you about a few I've read in the past couple of months that I remember of:

1) Squaddie: A Soldier's Story by Steven MacLaughlin

An interesting read, described by a certain review as being the British Jarhead, but of course with differences. This is the story of a British Army infantryman in the new millenium, as opposed to Jarhead's tale of a United States Marine Corps Scout Sniper in the first Gulf War. I'll recommend this book to anyone who would like to take a look at the life of the average modern-day British soldier. The book is the telling of his story starting with a glimpse of his childhood and why he wanted to become a soldier in the first place, and on to his tours of duty in both Iraq and Northern Ireland, and what happened there and afterwards.

2) Band of Brothers by Stephen Ambrose

I haven't seen the miniseries but I've been wanting to for quite some time. Got to read the book first though, and I guess now that it's better I did the reading before the viewing. I think the book basically tells the same story as in the series (duh!) and more, because they can only fit so much on screen. It tells the story of Easy Company, 2d Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment (PIR), 101st Airborne Division (the famous Screaming Eagles), US Army, right from their start while undergoing training in Toccoa, Georgia, to their time in England, then D-Day, then in various battles against the Germans and finally into Germany and the end of the war. I'll recommend this to anyone with the slightest hint of interest in the military and/or WWII history.

3) A Dirty Distant War by E. M. Nathanson

My father bought this for me. Seeing that it was fiction but based around true events, I started reading it albeit reluctantly. However, after the first few pages, I was kinda gripped. The book's location and setting weren't exactly my favourite (the India-Burma-China Theater, WWII), but I appreciated the differences between that and the traditional image of WWII projected by books like Band of Brothers. The book tells the story of an US Army Major sent to China, and all the tangles the war had created in China. Not for the average reader I think, but again, anyone with an interest in WWII fiction could consider this.

4) A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking

THE popular science book. I'm convinced that anyone thinking of doing Astrophysics or Physics at undergraduate level will want (and need) to read this book. And everyone else, for that matter. I just have this feeling that everyone should read it. It offers an insight into the workings of the mind of one of the most prominent physicists of the past century. I particularly liked Hawking's playful scientific prejudices, which just go to show that even at the forefront of discovery and at the highest levels of science, humans are still human. The first couple of chapters were easy to digest but as the book progressed, the language got a bit tougher and the ideas a bit high-level. Anyhow, again, I recommend it to everyone: read it a couple of times if necessary, but at the end of it all, you'll come out enlightened. A tour de force.

5 comments:

JTankers said...

Possibly enlightened, or possibly more confused. Dr. Hawking's theories are controversial and a few physicists consider some of his ideas to be more conjecture than science, not particularly likely to be correct. But interesting ideas!

I would recommend Dr. Rodger Penrose's book's "Road to Reality" (Dr. Penrose introduced Dr. Hawking to the concepts of black holes at the University of Cambridge). It might be a good start, less conjecture and more science also designed to be readable by non-physicists.

Ayyub said...

Okay.. Echoes most of what I've read online on forums. But, like you said, it's interesting all the same!

Yep, I've read about Penrose's book and am trying to get it here but most likely will only find it in Malaysia. About every decent online review that I went to recommended "Road to Reality" for further reading.

Thanks!

JTankers said...

Hello Ayyub,

I actually stumbled on your blog looking for sites discussing the Large Hadron Collider. I am assisting in educating about the potential danger and counter unsupportable public relations statements of "no danger", "don't worry...".

The physicists involved, actually a majority of experimental physicists really really want to believe that this type of experimentation is safe, otherwise it could shut down a huge amount of science research.

The problem is not only might it be unsafe, it might be really really unsafe.

The issue is that the energies are so high that the experiment may collapse some particles into 'micro black holes'. (CERN estimates possible creation at a rate of one per second).

If these exotic particles evaporate or grow extremely slowly, then there would be no problem. However several PHDs in Math and Physics and other theoretical sciences (we have quotes and links) believe that BOTH might be false. Micro black holes may likely NOT evaporate and they might grow relatively QUICKLY.

That might mean that in a matter of just perhaps a few years or decades a single micro black hole could grow so large that it might actually collapse the entire Earth into it.

CERN wishes to start operating the LHC experiment later this year and is planning to release a study that will attempt to prove safety. But it might not be possible. And the fear is that the experiment might go forward anyway, with the hope that it will prove to be safe...

The alternative is hugely negative for the thousands employed by the experiments and who have been working for years to conduct their experiments. Big stakes for careers, science, prestige, funding, etc.

A court case before US Federal Courts to compel reasonable proof of safety has its first hearing on June 16 2008 in Hawaii.

More information is available at LHCFacts.org and similar sites (we have a wealth of quotes, links, articles, etc.).

Cheers,
JTankers
LHCFacts.org

Ayyub said...

Woah.. I'm taking all this with a pinch of salt, but I really do hope that the guys up there at CERN make sure beyond all doubt that the experiments to be conducted will be safe and then make it known to the public to allay all our fears.

JTankers said...

I understand the feeling, "take with a grain of salt".

The subject has had my full attention for months...

I recommend the following msnbc article ""
Doomsday debate update... Posted: Friday, May 30, by Alan Boyle
(http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/30/1078538.aspx)

LHCFacts.org is good place to start your research, also the wikipedia article on the Large Hadron Collider, and the discussion page...

Cheers!
JTankers
LHCFacts.org